My Dad’s birthday was a few weeks ago, and we went to see Avatar.
You want my take? Here’s my take:
James Cameron is a fucking pro at making movies that trick people into thinking they’re awesome just long enough to get a gigantic pile of money and an Oscar. You remember Titanic? It made historically high amounts of money and got something like 30 Oscars, including best picture. Does anyone still believe that this is one of the best movies ever, or even the best one released in 1997?
Now Avatar is starting to be discussed as a possibility for a picture of the year nomination.
Before we go any further, let’s play a little game. I’m going to explain the premise of the movie, and you’re going to try and figure out what happens. Ready? Go.
- There’s this planet inhabited by aliens called “Na’vi” that has a rich supply of this mineral that’s called “unobtainium”.
I’ll just give you a second to let that sink in.
- Humans want this mineral very badly, and there’s a very rich vein of unobtainium on this planet that happens to be underneath a Na’vi settlement. The humans want to get to it, but they can’t because the Na’vi, who they consider savages, refuse to leave their settlement.
- The marines and businessmen on the planet want to get the aliens out of their settlement by any means necessary, but there’s also a group of scientists stationed there that are trying to befriend the aliens, understand their culture and then convince them to leave their settlement peacefully, so the humans can get all of the sweet, sweet … unobtainium that they want.
- The scientists are planning to get along with the aliens by using these devices that allow them to control biologically engineered Na’vi. Basically, you lie down in this thing that looks like a futuristic iron maiden, and then you can control one of the lab-grown Na’vi assigned to you.
- No, really. It’s called “unobtainium”.
- A strong willed, unpolished rookie manages to get into the tribe, who reluctantly agree to allow him to stay and learn their peaceful, nature-loving ways. He will be taught by the tribe leader’s daughter.
Okay, I’m going to give you 30 seconds to try to guess what happens for the remaining two hours of the movie, even though you probably only need 15.
Ready?
If you guessed “The headstrong rookie learns to love the kind, peaceful ways of the Na’vi, learns that once he gets to know them, they turn out to be more like him than he originally though, everybody learns from each other, and after a flashy standoff with a lot of explosions, the evil military and capitalists are sent packing”, you’re not only correct, you know how to identify a predictable storyline.
You know what this reminds me of? District 9, which everyone also loved.
In District 9, a bunch of aliens show up on earth in a giant flying saucer with a bunch of super-powerful guns that only they can operate. Unfortunately, they don’t appear to be smart enough to find a way to use their vastly superior technology or weapons to do any better for themselves on earth than a beat-to-shit shanty town in South Africa. A guy that’s originally sent to evict them to an even shittier shanty town accidentally inhales some of their fuel, which naturally starts turning him into an alien. He’s forced to run from the evil human capitalists and military men and befriend an alien. He learns the ways of the aliens, realized that they’re not that different from him, and develops compassion for them. After a flashy standoff with a lot of explosions, the evil military and capitalists are foiled.
Are you starting t0 notice a pattern here? Boy, I am.
First, you make a flashy action movie with a lot of crazy special effects and explosions. Then, you put in a group of aliens extremely similar to an oppressed group of real life people. The humans in the story are all fucking with the aliens because of a greedy profit motive of some kind, except for one small group of people who come to understand and accept the aliens and realize that we’re all not so different. Then, you give it a strange, cryptic title and brace for the gigantic flood of money and praise that’s headed your way.
Well, fuck these guys. I want my piece of the pie too, so I’m working on a script of my own that’s going to get me a share of this action. I’m not going to say too much about it, because I don’t anyone stealing my million dollar idea, but I will tell you the title:
“Space Pocahontas”.
It’s gonna be huge. I don’t want to spoil it, but the humans show up to this other planet and want some land that’s already owned by an alien race with inferior technology. The humans in the movie have this really crazy intergalactic philosophy I came up with that they call “Space manifest destiny” and I’m already working on the in’s and outs of rendering some really amazing looking alien revenue centers that I’ve named ”Space Casinos”. I’ve showed some rough drafts of the script to a few people I know, and they all get really misty eyed during the “Space Trail of Tears” scene.
But I’ve said too much.
It’s not that I’m opposed to stuff like this; Avatar was really, really pretty and only kind of too long, and District 9 – actually, I didn’t really like District 9. What I’m saying is that both movies looked really cool and had at least semi-coherent plots (I mean, who HASN’T fed gasoline to a dog and turned it into a human?). There’s nothing wrong with movies like that, I just don’t understand why people are SO fired up about the artistic merit of them.
Oh well. I guess I can bitch about it, or I can cash in.
SPACE POCAHONTAS – COMING JANUARY 2012!!!
EDIT: Well, fuck. A quick google for “Space Pocahontas” reveals that I’ve been beaten to the punch.
DAMN YOU, CAMERON!!!
#1 by youknowdamnwellwhothisis on January 9, 2010 - 10:14 am
…Do they give space blankets with spacepox to the aliens. Or do you think people would say you are ripping off “War of the Worlds”?
#2 by myogdb on January 9, 2010 - 2:25 pm
It’s worth looking into either way.
#3 by Skip on January 9, 2010 - 10:34 am
You sound a bit jaded, man.
But hey, did you know that unobtanium is an actual scientific term?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unobtainium
#4 by myogdb on January 9, 2010 - 2:24 pm
Maybe I’m just getting old and angry. I’m just confused. Titanic won an Oscar. Avatar is being mentioned for one. I’m not saying that these movies are bad, but are they really candidates for the best picture of the year?
As for unobtainium, if my understanding is correct, it’s a joke name for something really rare and expensive. I’ll totally check out the link, though.
#5 by Bibi on January 9, 2010 - 4:52 pm
No, you’re not getting old and angry. Avatar was pretty to look at and it had Michelle Rodriguez as an added bonus. It was nice, that’s all.
There are other movies that are more deserving an academy award and had the bad luck to come out in the same year as Avatar.
#6 by tacobell on January 10, 2010 - 7:21 pm
First, do you really give a shit about the oscars? I find it interesting to see what movies get awards but generally I find those movies pretty painful to watch. I’d rather eat my hand than actually watch the oscar award show.
Second, Avatar certainly rehashes a story which reminds most people of Dances with Wolves or Pocahontas. That’s a generational response, those movies were rehashed from other previously successful movies/stories.
Third, there are no “new” movie plots this year, or really any year. Hollywood has about 10 movie story forms and every major movie is just a spin on that. You have to go watch an indie film like Primer to find something beyond a typical Hollywood plot form.
I enjoyed Avatar quite a bit because it took an established story form and did it well. It didn’t re-invent anything in terms of story telling but I felt it was polished and well crafted. Maybe I’m the jaded one… I feel like if you see a single advertisement for a film, economics has already committed that film to a typical Hollywood plot line. I thought Avatar was an amazing experience. I’m a big fan of everything Cameron has done, except for Titanic. I’m looking forward to his next movie.
#7 by myogdb on January 11, 2010 - 1:57 am
You make some interesting points. As for the Oscars, I guess that you’re right. I don’t care about things like the Grammies, so I probably shouldn’t care about the Academy awards. At the same time, I guess it just confuses me a little bit when a group of people have to determine what the best movie of the year was, and they come up with Titanic.
As for the 10 recycled plots, I agree. The thing that I think I found frustrating about it was that I felt like you could pause the movie at any point and predict what was going to happen for the next 30 minutes. I never felt like I was being kept “on my toes”. Then again, you have me thinking about this, and it could be that it’s just not a plot that I especially enjoy. When I’m watching some guy comedy like The Hangover or The 40 Year Old Virgin, I suppose it’s not as though those are especially cerebral either. It’s no less formulaic, I just really like the formula so it doesn’t bother me as much.
I like a lot of Cameron’s movies too. I could be wrong, I just feel like this is one of those movies that will be less like Terminator and more like Titanic that’s not going to age especially well.
Either way, all good points.
#8 by Atkins's Wife on January 11, 2010 - 11:18 pm
Okay, I have to step in here because I think it’s lame that you guys keep ripping on Titanic. Seriously, do you even know when Titanic won the best picture Oscar or which movies it was up against? I can safely bet that you don’t. Why? Because other than Oscar nuts, no one knows that shit. Go ahead and look it up. I had to. Seriously, what are the complaints that you guys have about Titanic? The plot? It certainly wasn’t poorly acted, so don’t give me that. And take away the “chick flick” factor, because that’s bullshit.
“Ugh, Titanic was so…blah blah blah” What, do you really think Good Will Hunting should have won? That movie was a pile of offal.
Titanic didn’t win Best Picture because it was the best plot. It won because it redefined movie making. No other movie was as epic, as technologically advanced.
Now, look at Avatar. It takes CG graphics to a whole new level. Plus there were some pretty cool technologies in it. You have to admire the depth to which Cameron works up his movies.
Criticizing Titanic 13 years later is like going back to Casablanca and saying that it’s “too cliche.” No movie stands up 100% to the test of time.
I’m not saying that Avatar or Titanic had particularly memorable plots. I mean, not every movie can have the novel, intricate plot line of Terminator. But, again, that’s not what they are about. So, give them a break.
Why can’t we just go into a movie and sit and enjoy it? Do you have to be surprised at every turn in every movie? I don’t think that Avatar was ever meant to be particularly plot-twisting.
I also liked District 9, but I’m too tired to defend it right now. Maybe later once my sass meter has recharged.
#9 by myogdb on January 13, 2010 - 4:12 pm
I never anticipated a day where I would have to defend a critical stance on Titanic. But fine. FINE.
I have to stick to my guns, for one reason and one reason only: You know what other movie came out in 1997? Beverly Hills Ninja. THE DEFENSE RESTS, BECAUSE THAT MOVIE IS FUCKING AWESOME. I know that stops the disagreement right there, but I’ll go on. Actually, I thought The Full Monty was pretty awesome, too.
If I’m understanding correctly, here’s the defense of these movies: A decent plot is complimented by revolutionary special effects and a host of good actors. I’m fine with that, but it brings up two points in my mind.
First of all, Jurassic Park, The Matrix, Star Wars and Terminator all fit the same description. I’d go as far as to say that I felt all of these were better movies or at least as good as Titanic, although I may just be saying that because I’m a boy and these are all action movies. Either way, they all had really amazing effects for their time, created a unique universe, had at least passable stories and at least decent actors, and all of them won Oscars, for things like acting, special effects and sound, but none of them won best picture.
Second, I feel like following this train of thought, if James Cameron were to take Goldilocks and the Three Bears, put it in some fantastic setting like space or ancient Egypt, load the cast up and then give it some really impressive special effects, I would be a stuffy, holier-than-thou dick if I thought that wasn’t the greatest movie made that year either, ESPECIALLY IF BEVERLY HILLS NINJA CAME OUT THAT VERY SAME YEAR.
I’m not saying that these are terrible movies. Except for Titanic. Actually, I’m just saying that to antagonize you. Except yes, I think Titanic sucks. (OR DO I?)
What I am saying is that A) part of what makes me think a movie is awesome is being able to watch it again and again and think it’s really cool, even after the original luster of the special effects has worn off and the actors have fallen off of everyone’s radar and B) I agree that Avatar had very impressive visuals, but I feel like the special effects end up over-inflating people’s perception of the quality of it.
I’m not saying that anyone should feel guilty for liking them, either, or that you can’t enjoy this movie. Almost all of my media consumption is trash. I listen to metal, I read junk, I play hours of video games and my favorite food is nachos. I love all of those things, and I don’t lose a lot of sleep about it or feel guilty that I don’t read more Dostoevsky, eat more foie gras and listen to Classical. But I also don’t expect any of the things I like to get a lot of critical acclaim, either.
#10 by Skip on January 19, 2010 - 9:57 pm
I can dig it. Where’s our next post?
#11 by myogdb on January 21, 2010 - 6:44 pm
Working on it now. I apologize. First it was games, and then I got sick and my brain barely worked for a few days.